A detailed nutritional comparison
Sweet potatoes are nutritionally denser compared to white rice, offering more fiber, vitamins, and minerals. White rice, however, is lower in calories and quicker to digest, making it suitable for athletes or situations requiring rapid energy replenishment. Sweet potatoes excel for overall health and balanced eating due to their nutrient profile.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 205 (per cup, cooked) | 180 (medium-sized, baked) | ✓ |
| Protein | 4g | 4g | − |
| Carbs | 45g | 41g | ✓ |
| Fat | 0.5g | 0g | ✓ |
| Fiber | 0.6g | 4g | ✓ |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A | 0mcg | 900mcg (100% DV) | ✓ |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 20mg | ✓ |
| Potassium | 68mg | 440mg | ✓ |
| Calcium | 16mg | 30mg | ✓ |
| Iron | 1.9mg | 0.7mg | ✓ |
Both foods provide 4g of protein per serving.
Sweet potatoes contain over 6 times more fiber than white rice.
White rice has slightly lower calories per serving than sweet potatoes.
Sweet potatoes have far more Vitamin A, Vitamin C, and potassium compared to white rice.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both are high in carbohydrates.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both foods are plant-based.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Neither contains gluten.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Sweet potatoes align closely with paleo guidelines, but white rice does not.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both foods are high-carb sources and unsuitable for low-carb diets.
Choose sweet potatoes if you're prioritizing overall nutrition and long-lasting energy. Opt for white rice if you need a quick carbohydrate source or prefer lower calories. Sweet potatoes are ideal for balanced eating and vitamin intake, while white rice works well for athletic performance or simplicity.
Choose Food 1 for: Athletes needing quick energy, calorie-controlled diets, simplicity in cooking
Choose Food 2 for: Balanced diets, digestive health, enhancing nutrient intake in meals