A detailed nutritional comparison
Sweet potato edges out rice due to its higher fiber content, richer nutrient profile, and antioxidant benefits. Rice, however, offers lower calories per serving and is a better fit for low-fiber diets or quicker energy boosts. Choose sweet potato for sustained energy and more vitamins; opt for rice for its versatility and simplicity in meals.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 per 1 cup cooked | 105 per 1 cup cooked | − |
| Protein | 2.7g | 2.0g | − |
| Carbs | 28g | 24g | − |
| Fat | 0.3g | 0.1g | − |
| Fiber | 0.4g | 4g | − |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A | 0 mcg | 19,218 mcg | − |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 22 mg | − |
| Potassium | 35 mg | 437 mg | − |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 0.6 mg | − |
Both foods have similar low protein content, under 3g per serving.
Sweet potato has 10 times more fiber than rice (4g vs 0.4g per cup).
Rice provides fewer calories per serving, making it better for calorie-controlled diets.
Sweet potato dominates in Vitamin A, Vitamin C, and potassium.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both are high-carb foods, not suitable for ketogenic diets.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both are plant-based and align with vegan dietary preferences.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Neither contains gluten and both are safe for gluten-intolerant individuals.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Rice is excluded from paleo diets while sweet potato is embraced for its whole food nature.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both foods are high-carb and do not fit into low-carb diets.
Sweet potato is ideal for individuals seeking a nutrient-dense carb source with more fiber, vitamins, and antioxidants. Rice is a better choice for those seeking a low-calorie, easily digestible, and neutral carb base for meals.
Choose Food 1 for: Quick energy, calorie control, side dish versatility
Choose Food 2 for: Weight management, vitamin boost, paleo-friendly meals