A detailed nutritional comparison
Edamame is nutritionally superior for protein, fiber, and overall micronutrient density, making it ideal for muscle building and energy needs. Apples offer lower calories and natural sugars, making them better suited for a light snack or quick energy boost.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 (medium apple) | 120 (1 cup shelled edamame) | ✓ |
| Protein | 0.5g | 11g | ✓ |
| Carbs | 25g | 10g | ✓ |
| Fat | 0.3g | 5g | ✓ |
| Fiber | 4g | 6g | ✓ |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C | 8.4mg | 9.5mg | ✓ |
| Calcium | 10mg | 98mg | ✓ |
| Iron | 0.2mg | 3mg | ✓ |
| Vitamin A | 4mcg | 23mcg | ✓ |
Edamame has 22 times more protein than an apple, making it a high-protein option.
Edamame contains 50% more fiber than an apple, supporting digestion and satiety.
Apples have 21% fewer calories, making them better for low-calorie diets.
Edamame has higher levels of key vitamins and minerals (e.g., calcium, iron, vitamin C).
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Edamame is lower in carbs (10g per serving) compared to apples (25g).
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both foods are plant-based and suitable for vegan diets.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both are naturally gluten-free.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Apples are paleo-friendly, while edamame is a legume and excluded in paleo diets.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Edamame is lower in carbohydrates than apples, making it more suitable for low-carb diets.
Edamame is far more nutrient-dense, offering protein, fiber, and micronutrients, ideal for those seeking a filling and nutritious snack. Apples are a lower-calorie, portable option for a quick energy boost and hydration. Choose edamame for enhancing satiety or muscle growth, and opt for apples when craving a light, on-the-go snack.
Choose Food 1 for: Low-calorie snacking, hydration, quick energy
Choose Food 2 for: High-protein diets, sustained energy, nutrient density