A detailed nutritional comparison
Corn thins outshine rice in several nutritional aspects, offering more protein and fiber, and fewer calories per serving. Rice, however, provides more carbohydrates, making it a better option for energy-intensive activities. Corn thins are ideal for low-calorie or high-fiber diets, while rice suits those with higher carb needs for sustained energy or physical activity.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 per 1 cup cooked (186g) | 40 per 2 thins (16g) | − |
| Protein | 2.7g | 1.4g | − |
| Carbs | 28g | 8g | − |
| Fat | 0.3g | 0.2g | − |
| Fiber | 0.4g | 1g | − |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0mg | − |
| Iron | 0.2mg | 0.3mg | − |
| Zinc | 0.6mg | 0.2mg | − |
| Magnesium | 13mg | 5mg | − |
Rice provides 1.3g more protein per serving compared to corn thins.
Corn thins offer 150% more fiber per comparable serving size.
Corn thins have significantly fewer calories per serving (40 vs 130).
Corn thins contain more iron, while rice is richer in zinc and magnesium.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both foods are high in carbs, exceeding keto-friendly limits.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Neither food contains animal products.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both rice and corn thins are naturally gluten-free.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both foods align with the paleo diet guidelines.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both foods contain a high amount of carbohydrates.
Choose rice for higher energy needs, such as before workouts or during carb-focused meals. Opt for corn thins as a low-calorie, high-fiber snack that fits into weight management or general snacking routines.
Choose Food 1 for: Sustained energy, carb-loading, post-workout meals
Choose Food 2 for: Weight management, light snacks, high-fiber diets