A detailed nutritional comparison
Chicken and grilled fish fillets are both excellent sources of lean protein, ideal for weight loss and muscle maintenance. Chicken has slightly more protein and fewer calories than fish, while grilled fish offers healthy omega-3 fats and additional micronutrients like selenium. Choose chicken for high protein content and post-workout meals; opt for fish for heart-healthy fats and overall nutrient density.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 165 (per 100g) | 206 (per 100g) | − |
| Protein | 31g | 22g | − |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g | − |
| Fat | 3.6g | 12g | − |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | − |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D | 0.2mcg | 5mcg | − |
| Calcium | 10mg | 30mg | − |
| Iron | 1mg | 0.3mg | − |
| Selenium | 20mcg | 40mcg | − |
Chicken provides 31g of protein per 100g, compared to 22g in fish.
Neither chicken nor fish contains fiber.
Chicken is lower in calories, offering 165 per 100g vs. 206 in fish.
Grilled fish has more Vitamin D, calcium, and selenium, benefiting bone and cellular health.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both are low-carb and high in fat/protein.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Neither chicken nor fish is plant-based.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Neither contains gluten.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both fit paleo guidelines as unprocessed animal proteins.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both are free of carbohydrates, making them ideal for low-carb diets.
Choose chicken if your priority is lean protein for muscle maintenance or weight loss, especially post-workout. Opt for grilled fish fillet if you're looking for omega-3s and micronutrients like selenium and Vitamin D to support heart and bone health. Both foods are versatile, healthy, and diet-compatible for low-carb, keto, and paleo lifestyles.
Choose Food 1 for: Weight loss, high-protein diets, post-workout meals
Choose Food 2 for: Heart health, anti-inflammatory diets, nutrient-dense meals