A detailed nutritional comparison
Both apples share similar nutritional profiles, but Pink Lady apples have slightly more fiber and antioxidants. Standard apples are excellent for general snacking, while Pink Lady apples may be better suited for those seeking added digestive benefits or natural sweetness.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 | 95 | − |
| Protein | 0.5g | 0.5g | − |
| Carbs | 25g | 26g | ✓ |
| Fat | 0.3g | 0.3g | − |
| Fiber | 4g | 5g | − |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C | 8.4mg | 10mg | − |
| Vitamin A | 98IU | 100IU | − |
| Potassium | 195mg | 210mg | − |
| Iron | 0.1mg | 0.1mg | − |
Both apples contain the same low amount of protein at 0.5g per serving.
Pink Lady apples contain 25% more fiber with 5g compared to standard apples with 4g.
Both apples contain the same number of calories, approximately 95 per serving.
Pink Lady apples have slightly higher amounts of Vitamin C, Vitamin A, and Potassium.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both apples are high in carbs and would not suit a ketogenic diet.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both apples are plant-based and vegan-friendly.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Neither variety contains gluten.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both apples are naturally paleo-friendly, as they are whole fruits.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both apples contain around 25-26g of carbs, which is too high for a low-carb diet.
Both apples are excellent choices for a healthy snack or breakfast addition. Choose Pink Lady apples when you want slightly more fiber and Vitamin C, or opt for a standard apple for a classic taste with similar nutrition. Neither suits low-carb or keto diets but are versatile for most other dietary plans.
Choose Food 1 for: General snacking, hydration, quick digestion support
Choose Food 2 for: Improved fiber intake, Vitamin C boost, satisfying sweetness