A detailed nutritional comparison
White rice and Japanese rice have similar nutritional profiles, with slight differences in calorie and carbohydrate content. White rice is marginally lower in calories and carbs, making it better for calorie-conscious individuals, while Japanese rice is stickier and ideal for dishes like sushi and rice bowls. Both are gluten-free and vegan-friendly options, but not suited for low-carb diets like keto.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 | 148 | ✓ |
| Protein | 2.7g | 2.6g | − |
| Carbs | 28.2g | 32g | ✓ |
| Fat | 0.3g | 0.2g | ✓ |
| Fiber | 0.4g | 0.4g | − |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.08mg | 0.09mg | ✓ |
| Niacin (B3) | 1.2mg | 1.3mg | ✓ |
| Thiamine (B1) | 0.02mg | 0.03mg | ✓ |
Both foods have nearly identical protein content.
Both foods contain an equal amount of fiber (0.4g per serving).
White rice has 12% fewer calories than Japanese rice.
Japanese rice provides slightly higher amounts of B vitamins.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both are high-carb foods with over 28g per serving.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both are plant-based and vegan-friendly.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Neither contains gluten.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both align with paleo guidelines as unprocessed grains.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Neither qualifies as low-carb due to their high carbohydrate content.
Choose white rice if you need a slightly lower calorie and carb option for weight management. Opt for Japanese rice for stickier texture and dishes like sushi, where its higher B vitamin content is a plus but with slightly more calories.
Choose Food 1 for: Quick meals, weight-conscious diets, pairing with protein-rich toppings
Choose Food 2 for: Sushi, nutrient-dense rice bowls, traditional Japanese dishes