A detailed nutritional comparison
Grilled salmon is nutrient-dense, rich in protein, omega-3 fatty acids, and several essential vitamins, making it superior overall compared to white rice. White rice, while lower in calories, is primarily a source of carbohydrates and lacks significant micronutrients, and is best for providing quick energy rather than sustained nutrition.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 150 (per 1 cup cooked) | 206 (per 3 oz) | ✓ |
| Protein | 4g | 22g | ✓ |
| Carbs | 33g | 0g | ✓ |
| Fat | 0g | 13g | ✓ |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | − |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D | 0mcg | 10mcg | ✓ |
| Calcium | 10mg | 12mg | ✓ |
| Iron | 0.4mg | 0.5mg | ✓ |
| Omega-3 Fatty Acids | 0g | 1.5g | ✓ |
Grilled salmon offers over 5 times the protein of white rice per serving.
Neither white rice nor grilled salmon provides dietary fiber.
White rice has ~27% fewer calories per serving.
Grilled salmon is an excellent source of essential vitamins like D and omega-3s.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Grilled salmon is low-carb, while white rice is high-carb.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
White rice is plant-based, while salmon is animal-derived.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Neither contains gluten.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Grilled salmon aligns with paleo principles; white rice does not.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
White rice is high in carbs, making it unsuitable for low-carb diets.
Grilled salmon is the better choice for nutrient density, high protein, and healthy fats, ideal for building lean muscle, heart health, and sustainable energy. White rice is suitable for those seeking quick, easily digestible carbs without added fats, making it a good side dish or pre-workout energy boost.
Choose Food 1 for: Pre-workout meals, energy for active individuals, simple carbs with minimal fat
Choose Food 2 for: Weight maintenance, lean muscle growth, overall well-rounded nutrition