A detailed nutritional comparison
Red rice is nutritionally superior to jasmine rice due to its higher protein, fiber, and micronutrient content. Jasmine rice, while lower in nutrients, has a softer texture and is ideal for dishes requiring mild flavors or quick energy. Both are great in their own right but cater to different dietary goals and culinary applications.
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 205 | 200 | β |
| Protein | 4g | 5g | β |
| Carbs | 45g | 42g | β |
| Fat | 0.5g | 1g | β |
| Fiber | 0.4g | 2g | β |
| Nutrient | Food 1 | Food 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.1mg | 0.2mg | β |
| Magnesium | 16mg | 43mg | β |
| Iron | 0.4mg | 1mg | β |
Red rice contains 25% more protein than jasmine rice per serving.
Red rice is significantly higher in fiberβ5 times more than jasmine rice.
Both jasmine rice and red rice have similar caloric content per serving.
Red rice offers better levels of Vitamin B6, magnesium, and iron, making it superior for micronutrients.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
Both foods are high-carb and not suitable for ketogenic diets.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both rice varieties are plant-based and suitable for vegan diets.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Neither option contains gluten, making them safe for gluten-free diets.
Food 1: Compatible
Food 2: Compatible
Both are unprocessed grains that fit the paleo framework.
Food 1: Not Compatible
Food 2: Not Compatible
With over 40g carbohydrates per serving, neither food qualifies as low-carb.
Red rice is the better choice for individuals looking for nutrient density, especially fiber, protein, and vitamins. Jasmine rice is a great option for quick energy needs or softer rice dishes with mild flavor profiles.
Choose Food 1 for: Quick energy, light dishes, mild flavor profiles
Choose Food 2 for: Improved digestion, nutrient-dense meals, hearty dishes